Is Vitamin D3 Better than D2?

Vitamin D Comes in Different Forms; They're not All the Same!

© Stephen Allen Christensen

Current recommended daily allowances for Vitamin D are probably too low, particularly when new research shows that higher doses can protect us from several diseases.

Anyone who watches television, stares at a computer screen or listens to a radio already knows the news: Vitamin D not only helps to build strong bones; it probably helps to protect us from heart attacks, cancer, diabetes, and even multiple sclerosis. Alas, many Americans aren’t getting enough of the “sunshine vitamin.”

Vitamin D’s role in preventing rickets (a disease characterized by softened and malformed bones) has long been understood. Misguided attempts to prevent rickets in the 1940s by supplementing foodstuffs with vitamin D led to the overdosing of many children, who subsequently suffered irreversible brain damage. Paradoxically, the ensuing apprehension about vitamin D toxicity resulted in a recommended daily allowance (RDA) that is too low for most people. Indeed, one recent study showed that 40% of American babies and toddlers may have inadequate levels of the vitamin; another study suggests that adolescents can and should be taking as much as five times the latest RDA of 400 units daily.

Vitamin D is unique among the many vitamins that contribute to optimum human health. It is the only vitamin that the human body, in a self-regulated process, can produce on its own via exposure to sunlight. About an hour of sun exposure each week is considered sufficient (and this can be achieved in several, short-term forays into the outdoors) but individual needs vary, depending upon age, skin color, and underlying health problems. However, with the well-documented connection between skin cancer and exposure to ultraviolet light, a lot of people are hesitant to spend much time in the sun; they prefer to take a vitamin D supplement instead. In many cases, these individuals will simply take the form of vitamin D that is recommended by their physicians.

Unfortunately, in spite of some excellent studies revealing the superiority of vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) as a supplement, the form of vitamin D found in major preparations of prescriptions in the US is vitamin D2 (ergocalciferol). It is noteworthy that vitamin D2 was developed and patented by the pharmaceutical industry and has since been prescribed by physicians for patients who need vitamin D. Many doctors don’t know that vitamin D2 differs radically from vitamin D3 in its physiologic activity. Once in the human body, vitamin D2 is inactivated in the normal metabolic pathway that converts vitamin D3 to an active precursor form of the vitamin. Vitamin D3 is the form that leads to higher levels of serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D, which is converted to 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D. This is the molecule that confers vitamin D’s benefits. Conversely, the metabolic products of D2 are not efficiently bound to important carrier proteins in the bloodstream, and they don’t effectively activate the appropriate cellular receptors. Finally, vitamin D2 has a shorter shelf life than D3.

In summary, then, it is clear that vitamin D3 is the preferred form of supplemental vitamin D; vitamin D2—in spite of longstanding medical dogma—should not be regarded as an acceptable source for supplementation.


The copyright of the article Is Vitamin D3 Better than D2? in Vitamins & Minerals is owned by Stephen Allen Christensen. Permission to republish Is Vitamin D3 Better than D2? in print or online must be granted by the author in writing.



Comments
Aug 17, 2008 3:57 PM
Guest :
You are not very infomed if you say that D2 was created by the pharmaceutical industry. Vitamin D2 is found in plants. It is active but it is less active than D3. And it is even perscribed by many doctors to decrease D3 and increase D2 in the body because D3 is a steriod. Besides that you aren't saying the side affects of D3 even in a dose of 500 I.Us many find that there bones become brittle.
Aug 17, 2008 5:56 PM
Stephen Allen Christensen :
I would refer you to http://www.ajcn.org/cgi/content/full/84/4/694
Physicians prescribe what they're taught to prescribe, and much of doctors' prescribing practices are dictated by the pharmaceutical industry in this country. That's just the way it is.
Doctors don't prescribe D2 to decrease levels of D3 in the body; unfortunately, they seldom give it a thought, because physicians, in the main, aren't well-versed in matters of nutrition.
I do speak from a position of experience, if not authority. Aside from getting a middling background in nutrition, I practiced medicine for nearly two decades. I can attest to the influence of "Big Pharma", both in medical education and in medical practice.
By the way, MANY of the molecules that are critical to cellular function are "steroids." Indeed, the very membranes of our cells are laden with steroid molecules. Just because a molecule is classified as a steroid doesn't mean it is detrimental to human health.
2 Comments


Post this Article to facebook Add this Article to del.icio.us! Digg this Article furl this Article Add this Article to Reddit Add this Article to Technorati Add this Article to Newsvine Add this Article to Windows Live Add this Article to Yahoo Add this Article to StumbleUpon Add this Article to BlinkLists Add this Article to Spurl Add this Article to Google Add this Article to Ask Add this Article to Squidoo